Question

Network-attached storage (NAS) increases management costs and is fault-prone.

Options:
A) True
B) False

Answer 1

The statement that Network-attached storage (NAS) systems increase management costs and are fault-prone is generally considered false. NAS can reduce costs and has built-in redundancy to mitigate faults.

Step-by-step explanation:

The statement 'Network-attached storage (NAS) increases management costs and is fault-prone' is largely considered false. NAS devices are popular for both home and business users because they provide an easy way to share large amounts of data over a network. By centralizing storage, NAS can actually reduce management costs by simplifying the backup process and making data management less labor-intensive compared to managing multiple local storage devices.

NAS systems are designed with redundancy features such as RAID configurations that can prevent data loss in case of hardware failure, making them less fault-prone than individual hard drives. However, it's important to note that no system is completely fault-proof, and regular backups are still recommended.

Answer 2

Network-attached storage (NAS) is generally not costly to manage or fault-prone; it is designed for ease of use and reliability with features like RAID and redundant power supplies to mitigate risks.

Step-by-step explanation:

The statement that Network-attached storage (NAS) increases management costs and is fault-prone is generally false. NAS is a dedicated file storage device that provides local area network (LAN) nodes with file-based shared storage through a standard Ethernet connection. One of the main advantages of NAS is its simplicity and ease of use, which often leads to lowered management costs.

Additionally, NAS systems are designed for high availability and reliability. While no system is completely fault-proof, most NAS solutions come with built-in features to mitigate risks, such as redundant power supplies, RAID (Redundant Array of Independent Disks) configurations to protect against hard drive failures, and regular firmware updates to safeguard against vulnerabilities.

However, the perception of increased management costs and fault susceptibility may come from comparing NAS with more sophisticated storage solutions like storage area networks (SANs), which can provide higher performance and more complex features at a greater cost and complexity.