Final answer:
The acceptance rate is indeed a measure of recruitment and selection issues, which is true in option a. The claim that voting rates in the U.S. are higher than in countries like Sweden and South Korea is false, with the U.S. often having lower participation. Term limits have been shown to significantly increase the number of women in state legislatures, which is true.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement 'Acceptance rate measures not just recruiting but selection issues as well' is true option a. Acceptance rate is a key metric used by institutions to understand the effectiveness of their recruiting strategies and how selective they are during the admissions process. A lower acceptance rate often indicates a more selective institution, which may choose to admit fewer applicants from a larger pool, emphasizing the competitiveness of the selection. Conversely, a higher acceptance rate could reflect a less competitive selection process or a focus on recruiting a larger number of students.
Regarding voting rates, the claim that 'Voting rates are higher in the United States than in most democratic industrialized countries, including Sweden and South Korea' is false. Statistics and comparative studies frequently demonstrate that the U.S. has lower voter participation than many other democracies. Countries like Sweden generally have higher voter turnout due to a variety of factors including political engagement culture, election procedures, and voter registration policies.
Finally, the assertion that 'Term limits have produced a statistically significant increase in the number of women serving in state legislatures' is historically true. Research has shown that term limits can disrupt the status quo and open opportunities for more diverse candidates, including women, to enter politics. However, the impact can vary based on other circumstances, and the increase is not uniform across all states or legislative bodies.