28.9k views
1 vote
Which of the following technologies is not typically considered for an increase in redundancy?

a) NIC teaming
b) Load balancing
c) EtherChannel
d) Unicast

1 Answer

7 votes

Final answer:

Unicast is the technology not typically considered for an increase in redundancy as it is a one-to-one communication method. The other options, NIC teaming, Load balancing, and EtherChannel, are used for network redundancy and increased bandwidth.

Step-by-step explanation:

The technology from the given options that is not typically considered for an increase in redundancy is d) Unicast. Redundancy in networking is the inclusion of extra hardware or software that is used to ensure network availability and reliability in case of failure. Let's briefly look at why the other options are indeed used for redundancy:

  • NIC teaming: It combines multiple network interface controllers (NICs) to function as a single logical interface, which provides redundancy and increased bandwidth.
  • Load balancing: It distributes traffic over multiple servers or links to balance the load, which can prevent overloading a single resource and thereby adds redundancy.
  • EtherChannel: It is a form of link aggregation used in networks that allows the grouping of several physical Ethernet links to create a logical Ethernet link for increased bandwidth and redundancy.

On the other hand, Unicast is a communication method in which a piece of information is sent from one point to another point, specifically in a one-to-one communication method. It does not inherently provide redundancy or load balancing unless it is paired with other redundant systems.

User Dan Stern
by
8.5k points