Final answer:
The firm's ability to manage and service additional debt is critical, considering the cash flow, profitability, and creditworthiness. Raising funds through borrowing or issuing stock has its pros and cons, with borrowing retaining control but adding fixed financial obligations and issuing stock diluting ownership. Smaller firms often prefer bank loans while larger firms may issue bonds.
Step-by-step explanation:
When a firm with high leverage is planning to obtain additional debt financing, one crucial aspect that should be most carefully examined is its ability to manage and service the debt. Given that the firm is already highly leveraged, analyzing its current and projected cash flows is essential to ensure that it can meet its debt obligations, alongside interest payments, without compromising its financial stability.
Additionally, assessing the firm's profitability and creditworthiness takes on increased importance, as this influences not only the likelihood of obtaining further debt but also the terms and costs associated with it.
The decision between raising funds through borrowing or by issuing stock depends on several factors. Debt financing can be advantageous for a firm that is looking to maintain control of its operations since it does not involve relinquishing any ownership, compared to issuing stock which would dilute current shareholders' stakes and could subject the firm to the influence of new shareholders and a board of directors.
However, debt financing also comes with the obligation to make regular interest payments irrespective of the firm's income, posing a risk if the firm's cash flow is insufficient.
If a small firm needs a surge of financial capital for a major expansion, the choice between issuing bonds and bank borrowing also becomes relevant, with bank loans typically being more suitable for smaller, personalized borrowings and bond issuances being more common for larger, well-known firms.