Final answer:
The least likely strategy to resolve a scoring disagreement in the weighted point evaluation method is to adjust the scoring criteria. Instead, a mediator might be used, the higher score retained, or the product reassessed independently.
Step-by-step explanation:
In the weighted point evaluation method, when faced with disagreements between product evaluators, the least likely strategy to resolve the differences is Option 1: Adjusting the scoring criteria. Adjusting criteria is generally not favored because it can undermine the integrity of the evaluation process, which ideally should be defined clearly before the assessment begins. Instead, evaluators would more likely pursue strategies such as Option 2: Mediating to reach a consensus, Option 3: Retaining the higher score, or Option 4: Reassessing the product independently. These approaches help maintain the consistency of the criteria and respect the evaluative framework that has been established.
It is important to note that in a real-world application, students might use a balanced approach that considers all options as suggested in earlier exercises like determining a personal weighting scheme or analyzing the plausibility of given answers. This mirrors group decision-making situations where negotiation and reassessment are part of the process to achieve goals.