182k views
1 vote
Use The Alien and Sedition Acts articl to answer the following question: Which option is an accurate and objective summary of the Alien and Sedition Acts? Question 2 options: The Alien and Sedition Acts were created to give the government more power against foreign and domestic threats. The acts made it harder for immigrants to stay in the country as well as vote. They also prohibited public expression of opposition to the government. The Alien and Sedition Acts were created in response to the Jay Treaty between England and France. They made it harder for immigrants from those countries to come to the United States and vote. They also eliminated any free speech for immigrants. The Alien and Sedition Acts created by Adams were a clear violation of the First Amendment to the Constitution. They were designed to punish those who rightly criticized him for his self-promotion and greed. Ultimately, states decided not to enforce the acts. The Alien and Sedition Acts created by Adams and other Federalists were designed to promote a stronger central government. They were understandably opposed by Democratic-Republicans in Congress. The acts were eventually overturned by the Supreme Court.

User Kwhitley
by
7.4k points

1 Answer

4 votes

Final answer:

The Alien and Sedition Acts were laws targeting immigrants and limiting free speech, seen as overreaching federal power. Democratic-Republicans viewed them as unconstitutional, which led to the controversial Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions and ultimately their repeal in the Jefferson administration.

Step-by-step explanation:

The Alien and Sedition Acts were a series of four laws enacted in 1798 that targeted immigrants and constrained freedom of speech. The Naturalization Act extended the residency requirement for U.S. citizenship from five years to fourteen. The Alien Act and the Alien Enemies Act empowered the President to deport or jail non-citizens who were deemed a threat, while the Sedition Act criminalized criticism of the government.

These acts were seen by Democratic-Republicans as an overreach of federal power and a threat to individual liberties and states' rights. The subsequent Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions argued that the acts were unconstitutional, introducing the concept of nullification. Although the majority of states did not accept these resolutions, the controversy contributed to a shift in political power, eventually culminating in the acts being repealed under the Jefferson administration.

User SteveCl
by
7.8k points