Final answer:
Restrictions on performance objectives and standards are the exception that do not increase the potential for self-control; self-regulation is enhanced by goals, resources, and mission sense. It is empowered by an internal locus of control and a strong sense of self-efficacy, which reflects one's confidence in personal abilities.
Step-by-step explanation:
The potential for self-control is increased when people have all of the following EXCEPT D) restrictions on performance objectives and standards. Self-control or self-regulation is intimately connected with one's ability to set and pursue their goals, having the necessary resources, and a sense of purpose or mission within an organization. The idea of improved self-regulation is often linked to a change in perception of the systems people navigate, this is mirrored in the goals they set for themselves.
Those with a strong sense of self (b. all of our thoughts and feelings about ourselves), a belief that they control their own outcomes (c. the belief that we control our own outcomes), and therefore have an internal locus of control, are typically better positioned to exercise self-regulation. In contrast, believing that outcomes are outside of one's control (d. the belief that our outcomes are outside of our control) can diminish this potential.
Self-efficacy, or the level of confidence in your own abilities, is also a critical aspect of self-regulation (10. a. self-efficacy). Furthermore, individuals who perceive a high degree of control in their jobs, such as those who make personal economic choices -- whether they seek profit, provide for family, or pursue a meaningful career -- often experience better health outcomes and a sense of personal freedom (personal choice and freedom).