Final answer:
Science differs from myth in its reliance on evidence and logic; however, myths have historically inspired scientific inquiry by providing explanations for natural phenomena that prompted further investigation.
Step-by-step explanation:
The difference between science and myth is significant; science is a method of understanding the natural world that involves evidence and logic, while myths are stories that stem from a culture's traditions and beliefs. Science systematically studies natural phenomena and seeks to explain them through observations and evidence, which may lead to the development of hypotheses and theories. On the other hand, myths served as early explanations for natural events before the advent of scientific methods. Despite their differences, myths did contribute to the formation of science by stimulating curiosity and presenting phenomena that needed to be explained, thus inspiring scientific investigation.
Without myths, the questions that propelled scientific discovery might not have been asked. Myths provided the narratives that helped shape early scientific speculation, eventually leading to a more empirical approach to understanding the world. While science now uses evidence-based methods, myths still have value in understanding the historical and cultural contexts from which scientific thinking evolved.