Final answer:
Gottschalk's conclusion about long-term goals emphasizes the text's relevance to future challenges, strengthens arguments through comparisons and expands on earlier rationales, all with the aim to engage the reader and encourage critical thinking.
Step-by-step explanation:
Gottschalk's discussion of long-term goals in the conclusion serves several key purposes within the text. By looking to the future, they not only create a sense of closure but also invoke a persuasive element that encourages the reader to think critically about the implications of the text for ongoing and future scenarios. For instance, when an epilogue puts the tone of a textbook in context with the challenges ahead, it helps to frame the content of the book as relevant and applicable to real-life situations.
Moreover, conclusions like these commonly aim to demonstrate the writer's intent to both meet and challenge conventional expectations in a rhetorically effective manner.
This might involve strengthening an argument through comparison with contemporary texts, as Garrison does, or by tying back to an opening anecdote as Kumar does, thus drawing in the reader's attention once again. By responding to questions raised earlier in the text or expanding rationales, as Trumbore does, the author reinforces the significance of their message.
Additionally, by proposing a forward-looking solution as Peterson does through his calls for solidarity, an author can leave a lasting impression that aligns with the reader's emotions and motivates action.