Final answer:
Both passages advocate for a four-day school week, with Passage 1 focusing on benefits to families and Passage 2 concentrating on benefits to students, including rest, playtime, employment opportunities, and overall well-being.
Step-by-step explanation:
The four-day school week is a concept that has been debated for its potential benefits to students and families. In comparing the viewpoints of two different passages, it can be seen that both passages argue in favor of a four-day school week, but they focus on different beneficiaries of the policy change. Passage 1 emphasizes the benefits to families, suggesting that a shorter school week would allow for more family time and rest, subsequently leading to healthier families and higher-achieving students. Passage 2, on the other hand, focuses on the benefits to students, highlighting the advantages for younger students who need playtime and older students who need additional sleep, as well as the opportunity for all students to have more time for jobs and recharging before the school week. The best comparison, therefore, would be that the first passage argues that families will benefit from a four-day school week, while the second passage argues that students will benefit, covering both elementary and upper-grade students.