Question

This question has two parts. First, answer part A. Then, answer part B.

Part A
Which of these inferences about the author's purpose is supported by the text?
a. The author wrote the text in order to motivate people to get out into nature and learn more about animals.
b. The author wrote the text in order to motivate people to stop fearing amphibians and reptiles and instead help them survive.
c. The author wrote the text in order to shame people about their ignorance of the difference between amphibians and reptiles.
d. The author wrote the text in order to encourage more humans to take amphibians and reptiles into their homes to care for them as pets.​

Answer 1

The purpose of the author likely aligns with motivating readers to appreciate and help conserve reptiles and amphibians, rather than keeping them as pets or shaming the audience for their lack of knowledge.

The correct option is c. The author wrote the text in order to shame people for their ignorance of the difference between amphibians and reptiles.

Step-by-step explanation:

To determine which inference about the author's purpose is supported by the text, we should consider the themes and messages that are evident from the text. If the text hints at the appreciation and protection of amphibians and reptiles, we might infer that the author's purpose aligns with option B: to motivate people to stop fearing these animals and instead help them survive. This inference would require support from examples within the text that showcase the author's intent to inform the audience about the importance of conservation and suggest a symbiotic relationship between humans and nature, rather than promoting keeping these animals as pets or shaming the readers for their ignorance.

The correct option is c. The author wrote the text in order to shame people for their ignorance of the difference between amphibians and reptiles.