Final answer:
Chino and Blanca's presumed perspectives on name changing would be influenced by the broader discussions of identity, assimilation, and social dynamics, considering the complex interplay between race, ethnicity, and the pursuit of social mobility or acceptance in different societies.
Step-by-step explanation:
Chino and Blanca, within the context of the historical and cultural discussions provided, likely hold complex views about people changing their names based on the multifaceted relationships between identity, race, ethnicity, and social dynamics. Name changes can be a reflection of personal choice, cultural assimilation, or social mobility, and the implications are nuanced depending on the cultural and societal context. For example, white-skinned immigrants such as the Irish and Italians had the option of changing their names to blend in and pursue the American dream, whereas people of color may change names for different reasons, like avoiding discrimination or claiming a new identity aligned with their self-perception or aspirations.
Name changes can often signify a desire to assimilate or avoid discrimination, as illustrated in studies from Toronto and Germany where individuals with foreign-sounding names experienced hiring biases. On the other hand, in regions like Latin America or the Caribbean, the perception of one's race can shift drastically compared to the United States, resulting in identity reclassification with potential social repercussions. Furthermore, the term 'Hispanic' reflects the US government's overgeneralization of diverse groups, which many individuals with Spanish-speaking heritage may find reductive, preferring nationality-based identifiers instead.