59.9k views
3 votes
Social Darwinism says that those who are poor must deserve to be so and therefore do not require help from society, while Social Gospel believes that society is responsible for even the poor and should provide support for the less fortunate." What are the core differences between Social Darwinism and the Social Gospel in their beliefs about society's responsibility toward the poor?

A) Both Social Darwinism and the Social Gospel advocate for personal responsibility among the poor.
B) Social Darwinism believes that the poor deserve their condition, while the Social Gospel asserts society's responsibility to support the less fortunate.
C) Social Darwinism emphasizes the need for religious charity, while the Social Gospel focuses on natural selection.
D) Both Social Darwinism and the Social Gospel argue for complete separation of the rich and the poor.

User Kaom Te
by
8.1k points

1 Answer

6 votes

Final answer:

Social Darwinism promotes the idea that the poor deserve their condition and don't require help, while the Social Gospel believes that society has a responsibility to support the less fortunate.

Step-by-step explanation:

Social Darwinism and the Social Gospel are two contrasting beliefs about society's responsibility towards the poor. Social Darwinism, influenced by a loose interpretation of Darwin's theory of evolution, argues that society should not provide artificial assistance to those who are unable to compete effectively in society. According to Social Darwinism, the poor are seen as having inferior traits and are destined to die out. In contrast, the Social Gospel emphasizes society's responsibility to support the less fortunate and provide assistance to the poor, based on the belief that society should help those in need.

User Jaythaking
by
8.6k points