Final answer:
If I had been a representative at the First Continental Congress, considering the circumstances at that time, I would likely have favored attempting a peaceful agreement with Great Britain before resorting to war.
Step-by-step explanation:
If I had been a representative of the First Continental Congress, my decision would have depended on the prevailing sentiment among the other delegates and the specific circumstances at that time. However, considering the events leading up to the Congress and the actions taken by the British authorities, it is likely that I would have been in favor of trying to work out a peaceful agreement rather than immediately going to war against Great Britain.
The First Continental Congress was convened in response to the Intolerable Acts imposed by the British government on the American colonies. The delegates' primary purpose was to draft a list of grievances and a statement of the rights of the colonists in order to address these repressive measures. While some representatives advocated for a conciliatory approach, proposing an imperial union with Britain, the majority of the delegates favored a more radical stance, leaning towards separation from the Crown.
However, the Congress did agree to meet one year later to consider the response of the Crown before making a final decision. Unfortunately, by the time the Second Continental Congress convened in May 1775, the Revolutionary War had already started with the shots fired at Lexington and Concord. This suggests that the colonists were inclined towards peaceful resolution initially, but the acts of aggression by the British authorities forced them to reassess their options.