Final answer:
The English Bill of Rights did not outline direct punishments for the king but significantly limited the power of the monarchy and set forth protections for English subjects. This included parliamentary supremacy in fiscal matters and the reaffirmation of certain liberties like trial by jury and protections for Protestants while penalizing Catholics in various aspects.
Step-by-step explanation:
The English Bill of Rights and Royal Punishments
The question concerns which types of punishments the king was subjected to according to the English Bill of Rights. However, the document did not directly impose punishments on the monarch itself. Instead, the 1689 Bill of Rights limited the powers of the king and set forth the protections for English subjects. One consequence for the monarchy was the establishment of a constitutional monarchy and the requirement for the Crown to obtain Parliament's approval for raising money (taxes). It also prohibited the monarchy from infringing on specific rights, including trial by jury and habeas corpus, and it specified that the kings of England and members of the royal family had to be Protestants, barring Catholics from bearing arms or worshiping freely.
Therefore, rather than enumerating punishments for the king, the Bill of Rights restrained his powers and delineated the rights of the subjects and Parliament. It was a revolutionary document influenced by Locke's ideas that sought to protect life, liberty, and property, ultimately influencing other democratic societies and their constitutions, such as the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights.