Final answer:
Multiple perspectives are necessary to resolve conflict in the play '12 Angry Men', as the jurors with diverse backgrounds and opinions engage in heated debates and challenge each other's viewpoints. Through this clash of perspectives, they are able to examine evidence, question assumptions, and arrive at a fair and just verdict.
Step-by-step explanation:
Multiple perspectives are indeed necessary to resolve conflict in the play '12 Angry Men'. The play revolves around a jury's deliberations in a murder trial, with twelve jurors coming from different backgrounds and holding different opinions. Each juror brings their unique perspective, biases, and values to the table, which creates conflict and tension among them.
Throughout the play, the jurors engage in heated debates and arguments, presenting their own viewpoints and challenging others. It is through the clash of these perspectives that the jurors are able to explore different angles, consider alternative interpretations, and ultimately arrive at a fair and just verdict. This highlights the importance of multiple perspectives in examining evidence, questioning assumptions, and achieving a more comprehensive understanding of the situation at hand.
For example, the jurors have varying opinions about the credibility of key witnesses, the reliability of evidence, and the defendant's guilt or innocence. Some jurors believe in the defendant's guilt without a doubt, whereas others raise reasonable doubts and demand a careful examination of the evidence. Through deliberation, they confront their biases, challenge their initial assumptions, and gradually uncover the truth, ultimately reaching a unanimous decision.