Final answer:
California's decision to stop selling new ICE vehicles by 2035 can lead to improved air quality and environmental benefits but may cause economic disruptions and technical challenges.
Step-by-step explanation:
The decision by Governor Newsom to have no new internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles sold in California by 2035 can result in various positive effects. These effects include reduced emissions, better air quality, mitigation against climate change, promotion of technological innovation, and energy independence from oil imports. On the negative side, the decision could result in economic impacts to the automotive industry, possible consumer resistance due to the higher initial cost of electric vehicles, challenges with battery disposal, possible limitations on the electric grid with increased electric vehicle (EV) demand, and pushback because of current limited range between charges of EVs.Explanation in more than 100 words: By transitioning to a zero-emission vehicle market, California aims to reduce the smog and pollution that has been an issue since the 1950s. Hybrid automobiles and electric vehicles are poised to be a large part of the solution by using less fossil fuel and producing fewer emissions than traditional ICE vehicles. Yet, this transition is not without issues. It could uproot current industry structures, require heavy investments in new infrastructure, and necessitate significant changes to consumer behavior.Conclusion: While the move towards electric vehicles and hybrids presents a pathway to a more sustainable transportation future, achieving this goal comes with a set of challenges. A balance must be found between environmental benefits, technological feasibility, economic impacts, and societal readiness to embrace a major shift in personal transportation dynamics.