Final answer:
The court opinions in Betts v. Brady and Gideon v. Wainwright differ in their approach, but Gideon v. Wainwright overturned the previous ruling and established a new precedent for providing legal counsel to indigent defendants in state courts.
Step-by-step explanation:
The court opinions in Betts v. Brady and Gideon v. Wainwright differ in their approach to providing legal counsel to indigent defendants.
In Betts v. Brady, the court held that indigent defendants may be denied counsel when prosecuted by a state. However, this decision was overruled by Gideon v. Wainwright, where the court established that the Sixth Amendment guarantees the right to legal representation to all defendants facing felony charges, regardless of their ability to pay.
This connection between the two court opinions is explained by the fact that Gideon v. Wainwright overturned the previous ruling in Betts v. Brady and established a new precedent for providing legal counsel to indigent defendants in state courts.