Question

a media company is evaluating the possibility of moving its it infrastructure to the aws cloud. the company needs at least 10 terabytes of storage with the maximum possible i/o performance for processing certain files which are mostly large videos. the company also needs close to 450 terabytes of very durable storage for storing media content and almost double of it, i.e. 900 terabytes for archival of legacy data. as a solutions architect, which set of services will you recommend to meet these requirements?

Answer 1

A combination of Amazon S3, Amazon EBS, and Amazon Glacier services would be recommended.

Step-by-step explanation:

As a solutions architect, I would recommend using a combination of Amazon S3, Amazon EBS, and Amazon Glacier services to meet the media company's requirements.

1. Amazon S3: For the 10 terabytes of storage with maximum I/O performance, Amazon S3 offers high-speed object storage. It provides low latency and high throughput for processing large video files.
2. Amazon EBS: To meet the need for very durable storage (450 terabytes), Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store) can be used. It provides reliable block-level storage that is highly available and can be attached to Amazon EC2 instances for processing media content.
3. Amazon Glacier: To fulfill the archival requirement of 900 terabytes for legacy data, Amazon Glacier can be used. It offers low-cost storage for data that is not frequently accessed, making it suitable for long-term storage and data archiving.