Question

The power of the executive branch in relation to the legislative tranch has varied over time. Develop an argument that takes a position on the appropriate balance of power between the president and Congress

use at least one piece of evidence from one of the following foundationel documents
• Declaration of independence
• The Federalist 51 .
• The Federalist 70

In your response you should do the following
• Respond to the prompt with a defensbleclamor thesis that establishes a line of reasoning
• Support your claim with at least two pieces of specific and relevant evidence One piece of evidence must come from one of the foundational documents listed above
• A second piece of evidence can come from any other foundational document not used as your first place at evidence or it may be from your knowledge of course concepts. Use reasoning to explain why your evidence supports your claim or thesis.
• Respond to an opposing or alternate perspective using refutation, concessionar rebuttal

Answer 1

The appropriate balance of power between the president and Congress is a subject of debate. The claim is that there should be a system of checks and balances. Evidence from The Federalist 51 and the Constitution supports this claim.

Step-by-step explanation:

The appropriate balance of power between the president and Congress has been a subject of debate throughout history.

A defensible claim on this issue is that there should be a system of checks and balances, where both branches have significant power but also have the ability to restrain each other when necessary.

One piece of evidence to support this claim is found in The Federalist 51, where James Madison argues that separation of powers is crucial to prevent tyranny.

Madison explains that each branch should have the ability to check and balance the others, ensuring no branch becomes too powerful.

A second piece of evidence that supports this claim comes from the Constitution itself, particularly Article I which grants key powers to Congress and Article II which grants executive power to the president.

This allocation of powers is a clear indication that the framers intended for both branches to have significant authority.

Opponents of this claim might argue that the executive branch should have more power to effectively respond to crises and make quick decisions.

However, granting too much power to one branch can lead to authoritarian rule and undermine the principles of democracy.