118k views
3 votes
Describe how the gentry and the middle class were different.

A. The gentry were wealthy landowners, while the middle class were artisans and traders.
B. The gentry were royal advisors, while the middle class were farmers.
C. The gentry were commoners, while the middle class were aristocrats.
D. The gentry were poor, while the middle class were rich.

User Nsinghphd
by
7.7k points

1 Answer

5 votes

Final answer:

The gentry were wealthy landowners engaged in high-status activities and public service, while the middle class were artisans and traders with less wealth and influence. The correct distinction between the two is that the gentry were landowners and the middle class consisted of artisans and merchants.

Step-by-step explanation:

The gentry and the middle class were quite different in terms of their wealth, occupation, and social status during various historical periods. The gentry were typically wealthy landowners who could afford to engage in high-status activities such as owning, borrowing, reading, and writing books. They often aspired to hold office and married within other gentry families, aligning themselves with traditions of scholarship and public service. In contrast, the middle class generally consisted of artisans, traders, and small merchants, who may have owned small factories and stores, but lacked the protection of significant wealth. While many artisans could achieve respectability within the emerging middle class, they did not hold the same societal influence as the gentry.Therefore, the correct answer to how the gentry and middle class were different is: A. The gentry were wealthy landowners, while the middle class were artisans and traders. This distinction was evident across various societies, including during the Industrial Revolution, where the gentry typically distanced themselves from the middle class, who valued work, consumption, and education.

User Basilisk
by
8.6k points