Final answer:
In contract law, a too vague term may be ignored to ensure that transactions are clear and the contract is enforceable. Vague terms can confuse parties regarding their rights and obligations. Contracts with unclear, dense, or legally complex language may require ignoring or clarifying vague terms for proper interpretation.
Step-by-step explanation:
A term of a written contract that is too vague to have a definite meaning sometimes may be ignored when transactions are unclear and confusing. This is because contracts must be clear and specific to be enforceable. Parties to a contract need to understand their obligations and rights, which can be difficult if the terms are not explicit. In cases where the language of the contract includes long, dense paragraphs with complex legal terms that could potentially worsen stressful situations such as breaking a lease, it might be necessary to ignore or seek clarification of vague terms to ensure fairness and accuracy.
Implicit terms in contracts refer to those that are suggested or implied but not directly stated. For instance, in a literary example from Edgar Allan Poe, "It is clearly inferred," demonstrates the use of implicit information that requires interpretation. Nevertheless, being implicit can make enforcement and interpretation challenging, especially when a party is arguing for a specific interpretation using rhetorical strategies to advocate their position.
When it comes to legislative processes, the term marked up refers to the action of amending a bill, which is a clear example of a specific and understandable term. In contrast, when terms become too derivative and unintelligible, their usefulness in a contract diminishes.