181k views
5 votes
to an advocate of social legislation which of the following is the most effective argument against an increase in the federal minimum wage?

User Sean Cogan
by
7.8k points

1 Answer

6 votes

One of the most effective arguments against an increase in the federal minimum wage, often presented by opponents of such legislation, is the potential negative impact on employment levels.

Advocates against increasing the minimum wage often argue that a significant rise in the minimum wage could result in increased costs for businesses, particularly small businesses, leading them to cut jobs or reduce hiring to offset the higher labor expenses. They suggest that this could disproportionately affect industries with lower profit margins and hinder job opportunities, especially for entry-level workers or those with fewer skills, potentially exacerbating unemployment rates.

Additionally, opponents may argue that an increase in the minimum wage might prompt some businesses to automate certain tasks or outsource jobs to lower-cost regions or countries, further impacting local employment opportunities.

This argument emphasizes the concern that raising the minimum wage could inadvertently lead to job losses and hinder economic growth, particularly in sectors heavily reliant on lower-wage workers. Advocates of social legislation should consider and address these concerns when advocating for an increase in the federal minimum wage, providing evidence or proposing solutions to mitigate potential negative impacts on employment.

User MilanHrabos
by
7.1k points