Final answer:
The most compelling argument to halt the progress of an AI system that fosters addiction is its negative impact on user well-being. The significance of AI's threat must be seriously regarded, and transparency in AI is crucial and challenging.
Step-by-step explanation:
If an AI-enabled system enables addictive behavior, the most compelling argument to stop development work on that system is that the system, as designed, acts counter to the well-being of the users. Technology should serve to enhance human life and efficiency, not detract from it. In the context of technoaddiction, where societies become dependant on new technologies, the ethical implications become clear. It's crucial that the threat of AI to human well-being be taken seriously. Swedish philosopher Nick Bostrom and many industry leaders have raised concerns about AI leading to the loss of the human skills needed to survive, which touches upon the potential harmful impacts on the well-being of individuals.
The acknowledgement that legal transparency for artificial intelligence is essential yet challenging to achieve is also a pertinent point. This transparency is tied to the understanding and management of AI systems to ensure they are beneficial to society. In light of these considerations, it is essential that we prioritize human safety and values in the continued development and implementation of AI technologies.