Final answer:
Estimating cost functions is difficult due to the aggregation of different product types and the exclusion of fixed costs from accounting information. Firms break down costs to gain insights but often lack comprehensive data, relying on production experiments to assess profitability.
Step-by-step explanation:
Estimating cost functions in practice is generally considered difficult to measure because output data often represent an aggregate of different types of products, making it challenging to allocate costs accurately to each product (2 and 4). Furthermore, cost data is typically derived from accounting information that may not include fixed costs (5), adding another layer of complexity to accurate cost estimation.
To understand costs, firms break down total costs into fixed costs, marginal costs, average total costs, and average variable costs. While least-squares regression analysis can help identify the general shape of the cost curve algebraically (1), the variations in types of products and the specifics of how costs are allocated can make the practical application of this method problematic. Firms often lack the necessary data to draw a complete total cost curve and must experiment with different levels of production to observe how changes affect profits. This experiential approach emphasizes how changes in production impact marginal revenue and marginal cost for profit maximization.