Final answer:
The question incorrectly mixes tax dependency claims with the Kennedy tax cut policy discussion. The Kennedy tax cuts of 1964 aimed at economic stimulation are a matter within Social Studies, and they had significant effects on tax rates, government revenues, and real GDP.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question seems to be referencing a dependency claim for tax purposes, which is typically addressed in tax law, not history. However, the context provided relates to the Kennedy tax cuts of 1964 and its economic implications, which is a topic within Social Studies. When the Kennedy administration implemented these tax cuts, they aimed to stimulate economic growth by reducing the burden of taxes on individuals and households. The cuts had effects on both the marginal and average tax rates, influencing taxpayer decisions regarding consumption and savings, and consequently impacting real GDP.
While the question appears to allude to the entitlement of claiming a dependent named Kennedy for tax purposes, without specific tax law details, it is not possible to answer who is entitled to the claim. However, when discussing the Kennedy tax cuts, it is essential to evaluate the broader economic effects such as the implications on government revenues and consumer spending—key considerations for policymakers then and now.