224k views
3 votes
Who might be at fault for missing the opportunity to tap into street smarts and channel them into good academic work? In the Hidden Intellectualism Article by Gerald Graff.

a) The students themselves
b) The parents
c) The education system
d) The government

User Baetheus
by
7.1k points

1 Answer

3 votes

Final answer:

The fault for missing the opportunity to channel street smarts into academic work may lie with the education system, parent's upbringing approaches, and government and community structures, all contributing to the recognition and development of diverse intelligence. The correct option is C.

Step-by-step explanation:

In Gerald Graff's article Hidden Intellectualism, the responsibility for missing the opportunity to tap into street smarts and channel them into good academic work may be multi-faceted. The primary fault could lie with the education system, which may not always recognize or value different forms of intelligence beyond traditional academic measures.

However, parents and their approach to child-rearing, as discussed by Annette Lareau and Malcolm Gladwell, also play a crucial role in how children's skills are fostered. Furthermore, the vignettes provided by Chris Langan's experience and the structural insights from education experts suggest that failure to integrate practical intelligence could also point to deficiencies in support and understanding within government and community structures.

As implied by Langan's story, possessing a high IQ without the social skills to navigate systematic barriers can be less advantageous than anticipated. The anecdote from Jeremy Iverson's High School Confidential illustrates how teachers' labeling can detrimentally affect students' aspirations, which implies a systemic issue within the school environment itself that transcends the reach of government policies.

User Gop
by
8.1k points