Final answer:
The success of a community that offers essential services in exchange for strict rule and religious adherence may vary for individuals based on personal values and the balance between benefits and personal freedom. It is subjective and can depend on whether the community members believe the trade-offs are worth their personal freedoms.
Step-by-step explanation:
The success of a community that provides for basic needs such as housing, jobs, school, food, and clothes, but requires strict adherence to rules and religion is not fully determinable as success can be subjective and dependent on the individuals within that community. When a community provides secure lifestyle elements, it can offer stability and a sense of safety for its members, which some may view as a form of success. However, the limitations on personal freedom due to the adherence to strict rules and religious practices can be considered repressive and potentially detrimental to the personal growth and happiness of individuals, leading others to view this as unsuccessful.
Communities and their governments need to balance individual freedoms with the common good. Decisions regarding such balances can range from those based on coercion to voluntary agreements by the community members. This dynamic plays a crucial role in how decisions are made about community rules, individual rights, and government restrictions.
Ultimately, whether a community is deemed successful is dependent on the values and needs of its members and the benefits and drawbacks they experience. Therefore, the answer to whether such a community would be successful is maybe, depending on the benefits it offers to individuals and the trade-offs they are willing to make regarding their personal freedoms.