Final answer:
The implicit argument of 'A New Nation?' is that nations like the United States construct identities combining myth and history, often underrepresenting negative aspects of their past. The text suggests that while America strives to uphold founding principles, such as freedom and opportunity, there have been historical contradictions to these ideals.
Step-by-step explanation:
An implicit argument or claim within the text “A New Nation?” is that nations, including the United States, construct national identities based on a mix of myth and history which can sometimes contradict factual evidence. Nations often highlight noble ideals, such as the United States being the land of opportunity and freedom, while underrepresenting the less favorable aspects of their past, such as the displacement of Native Americans and enslavement of African peoples. This tendency is reflected in various historical documents and speeches, such as the Gettysburg Address, which promote a vision of unity and democratic principles while not fully addressing the contradictions and exclusions present at the founding of the nation.
When considering how well America is living up to the ideals and principles established at its founding, one must acknowledge the progress and efforts made to align with principles such as equality and consent of the governed. However, this examination must also recognize the limitations and ongoing challenges resulting from historical contradictions and failures to fully realize these founding principles for all citizens. Discussions on this topic often reference the Gettysburg Address, historical resolutions of independence, and other foundational documents to highlight America’s aspirational goals of freedom and equality, while acknowledging the nation's inconsistent application of these principles throughout history.