Final answer:
Migrants from Sub-Saharan Africa often choose to migrate to Europe instead of the U.S., Canada, Australia, or other destinations due to factors such as perils and dangers on the journey, lack of money and transportation, and geopolitical boundaries. These factors represent the 'friction of distance' involved in their migration.
Step-by-step explanation:
Migrants from Sub-Saharan Africa often make the long, dangerous, and arduous trek to Europe instead of the U.S., Canada, Australia, or elsewhere more often due to a combination of factors. These factors include:
- Perils and dangers: The trek to Europe is already challenging, but the perils and dangers on the way are considered to be bad enough compared to other destinations. This could include risks such as crossing the Sahara desert, dangerous sea crossings, and other challenging terrains.
- Lack of money and transportation: Many migrants from Sub-Saharan Africa lack the financial resources required for long-distance travel to countries like the U.S., Canada, or Australia. Additionally, they may face limited access to proper transportation options, making Europe a comparatively more accessible destination.
- Geopolitical boundaries: The presence of numerous geopolitical boundaries, including borders, military forces, and police, can create additional hurdles for migrants. These boundaries can make it more difficult and risky to cross into countries like the U.S., Canada, or Australia compared to European countries.
All of these factors contribute to what is known as the 'friction of distance,' making the trek to Europe more common for migrants from Sub-Saharan Africa.