Final answer:
The Japanese-American internment during World War II showcases the prioritization of national security over citizenship rights, where individuals were deprived of liberties based on their race without evidence of disloyalty. Today, the tension between rights and national security persists in the context of counterterrorism. Korematsu's decision has been criticized as a historical error, emphasizing the need to protect civil liberties.
Step-by-step explanation:
The Japanese-American internment during World War II demonstrates a clear tension between citizenship rights and national security. This situation is reflected in option B: It showcases the prioritization of national security. The internment occurred under Executive Order 9066, signed by President Roosevelt, which resulted in over 110,000 Japanese Americans, including children and citizens, being forcibly relocated to internment camps. Races were judged as a collective threat to national security, leading to the loss of liberty and property without due process or evidence of individual disloyalty.
Today, we continue to see tensions between individual rights and national security, particularly in the context of counterterrorism efforts post-9/11. Similar discussions arose around policies such as the surveillance of U.S. citizens and the travel ban on certain predominantly Muslim countries. In a historical reflection, the Korematsu decision which upheld the legality of internment has been widely criticized and acknowledged as a mistake, which indicates the care that must be taken to safeguard civil liberties even during times of national crisis.