Final answer:
The Non-Aligned Movement would likely have viewed the Greek Civil War as a violation of national sovereignty and the Berlin Airlift as a potentially reckless act by the U.S. and the Soviet Union, emphasizing the need for peaceful resolution and respect for self-determination in line with the ten principles of the Bandung Conference.
Step-by-step explanation:
Non-Aligned Movement's Perspective on Cold War Events
During the Greek Civil War, the Non-Aligned Movement would likely view the conflict as a troubling example of external powers influencing a domestic struggle, which could compromise the principle of national sovereignty. As part of their initiative to remain independent from both the U.S. and the Soviet Union, the Unaligned Movement would have probably highlighted the importance of self-determination and peace in accordance with the principles set out in the Bandung Conference. Specifically, the Movement might criticize both sides for imposing their ideologies on Greece, instead of allowing the Greek people to resolve their conflicts internally and democratically.
Regarding the Berlin Airlift, opinions within the Unaligned Movement could be diverse, but generally, they would likely emphasize the humanitarian catastrophe that tensions between the superpowers could cause. They might critique both the Soviets and the Americans for the potential recklessness of their actions according to the principles of peaceful coexistence and mutual respect for sovereignty as stated in the ten principles of Bandung, known as the Dasasila Bandung. They would have likely called for a resolution through peaceful negotiation rather than actions that could lead to the suffering of civilians.