Final answer:
The statement is true; adding comments when overriding a risk grade computed value is typically required to provide a rationale for the change and ensure an audit trail for compliance purposes.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement is True: to override a risk grade computed value, you typically must add comments in order for it to be saved. This practice is part of risk management processes in financial institutions and corporations, where risk grades are used to assess credit risk or other types of financial risks associated with clients or investments. Adding comments is a critical step in the risk override process because it provides a rationale for why the original risk grade computed by the system should be modified. This is crucial for audit trails and compliance purposes. It ensures that any changes in the risk assessment are transparent, justified, and can be reviewed by other parties such as internal auditors or regulatory authorities.
For example, if the computed risk grade does not account for recent positive changes in a borrower's creditworthiness, an analyst might override the system's grade. When doing so, the analyst would need to provide detailed comments explaining the reason for this override, including references to supporting documents or analyses that substantiate the revised grade. Risk overrides without adequate justification can lead to compliance issues and can undermine the integrity of the risk assessment process, which is why comments are generally required to capture the reasoning behind any changes to computed values.