Final answer:
To minimize risks, the software development team should restrict access to the network share with the ACL, and provision a separate testing account with limited permissions to replace the use of the lead developer's credentials.
Step-by-step explanation:
The scenario you’ve described involves a software development team conducting functional and user acceptance testing for web applications, using a Commercial Off-The-Shelf (COTS) solution with hard-coded credentials. To minimize risk while continuing testing effectively, you should consider two approaches:Restrict access to the network share by modifying the Access Control List (ACL) to include only a specific group of individuals who need access to the test scripts, like developers.Create and provision a dedicated test user account that has the minimum necessary permissions to perform the testing actions. This account should not be a lead developer’s account or have extensive access rights within the enterprise directory.
It is essential to avoid using personal user credentials for automated testing and instead use an account designated for testing purposes. Additionally, since the username is less sensitive than the password, obfuscating the username is not as critical as protecting the password; therefore, encoding the username is not a recommended approach. Integrating testing with directory services might be a long-term solution but would not be considered a minimally disruptive action in the short term. Furthermore, redesigning web applications to accept single-use credentials offers higher security but may also be disruptive and time-consuming. Hence, the best actions are to restrict network share access and provision a new test user account.