Final answer:
Blaming is not considered a persuasive strategy like appeal to emotions, scare tactics, and appeal to intellect, as it does not aim to persuade through reason or emotion but assigns responsibility.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question asks which of the following is not an example of a persuasive strategy: appeal to emotions, scare tactics, blaming, or appeal to intellect. Three of these strategies - appeal to emotions, scare tactics, and appeal to intellect - are commonly recognized as persuasive techniques. Appeal to emotions can involve targeting various feelings such as fear, love, or guilt to influence an audience. Scare tactics are a specific type of emotional appeal that relies on fear to persuade. Appeal to intellect, also known as logos, involves the use of logical reasoning and evidence to persuade an audience. On the other hand, blaming is not typically categorized as a constructive persuasive strategy, as it does not necessarily aim to persuade through reason or emotion but instead assigns responsibility for an issue or problem.