Final answer:
Symbolic interactionism views marriage as a set of symbols and meanings, with family roles being socially constructed. An abusive, long-term marriage would be interpreted based on how individuals perceive and interact with those symbols. Despite challenges, children's views on marriage can remain positive, influenced by a variety of social and economic factors.
Step-by-step explanation:
From a symbolic interactionist perspective, the institution of marriage is viewed through the lens of symbols and meanings that are assigned to them. When considering a situation where parents are in an abusive, yet long-term marriage, an interactionist would focus on how the individuals in the family understand and give meaning to their roles and interactions within the marriage. For instance, an abusive relationship might alter a person's interpretation of marriage from a symbol of love and support to one of control and fear. This perspective also emphasizes how family roles are socially constructed and can change over time; what defined a "good father" in the past differs greatly from today's expectations.
Interactionists might also explore how the experiences and symbols associated with a long-term abusive marriage shape the expectations and attitudes of children within the family. Despite the challenges, sociological studies suggest that children's views on the importance of marriage and a strong family life can remain intact even in the face of parental divorce or dysfunction. The interactionist viewpoint acknowledges that families and marriages adapt to social change, are interpreted differently across cultures, and are influenced by various socioeconomic factors.