Final answer:
The statement suggesting that Virginia preferred reconciliation over independence is false. Virginia's resistance to British colonial policies was robust, and despite some initial attempts at finding a peaceful resolution, the colony eventually became a strong advocate for American independence.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that Virginia, unlike New England, felt that the thirteen colonies should try to reconcile with England and not separate is false. In Virginia, resistance to British rule had been growing, particularly after the issuance of the Dunmore's Proclamation, which declared martial law in Virginia and tempted slaves with freedom for supporting the British. Moreover, the attitude in Virginia was largely influenced by prominent figures like Thomas Jefferson, who authored the Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom, signaling a move towards independence and self-governance.
The Olive Branch Petition was a last effort at reconciliation with England by the American colonists, but it was dismissed by the King, further straining relations and leading towards independence. Virginia's initial attempts to suggest conciliation were met with harsh responses from the British, negating the view that Virginia was not in favor of separation. Ultimately, both Virginia and New England played significant roles in pushing towards American independence.
Concerning the provided reference information, the statement that the Conciliatory Proposition gave in to most of the demands of the American colonists is false. Also, the creation of the Dominion of New England was for various political reasons, including to assert more royal control over the colonies, rather than solely to punish Massachusetts Bay for its failure to convert local Indian tribes, which makes the premise false.