Final answer:
Load reports of capacity are misleading if queuing delays are not considered because they only show the number of tasks a system can handle, without accounting for the extra waiting time due to overloading.
Step-by-step explanation:
Load reports of capacity may indeed be misleading as they typically reflect just the number of tasks or users a system can handle, not taking into account the queuing delays that occur when the system is overloaded. In the context of computer networks or system performance, queuing delays are significant. They represent the time a task or packet must wait in a queue before it can be processed. When a system or a network element is said to have a certain capacity, for example the number of transactions per second it can handle, this does not necessarily include the waiting time in the queue, which can exponentially increase the actual response time for users as the load approaches or exceeds capacity.
The statement is True because without considering queuing delays, a load report only provides a partial view of the system's performance under load. Some systems may handle a high number of tasks but could incur substantial delays due to long queues, thus offering a lesser quality of service than what the load report seems to suggest. Therefore, it is crucial to consider both the raw capacity and the behavior of the system under various loads, including the impact of queuing delays, for a more accurate performance assessment.