150k views
0 votes
The constitution of India has not only listed fundamental rights but has also prescribed remedies against their violation. Justify the statement.

a) True
b) False

User Lot
by
8.0k points

1 Answer

2 votes

Final answer:

The statement that the Constitution of India provides remedies for the violation of fundamental rights is true. Moreover, the Necessary and Proper Clause has been used to expand federal power, not limit it, and it is true that no state constitution in the Revolutionary Era allowed women to vote.

Step-by-step explanation:

The statement 'The constitution of India has not only listed fundamental rights but has also prescribed remedies against their violation' is true. The Constitution of India provides remedies through articles 32 and 226, which allow an individual to approach the Supreme Court or the High Courts respectively, for the enforcement of their fundamental rights. These provisions underscore the importance that the constitution places on human rights and the rule of law, ensuring that if these rights are violated, there is a way to seek redress.

Discussing the secondary questions, the Necessary and Proper Clause, found in Article I, Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution, has actually been used to expand the powers of the federal government rather than limit them. This clause gives Congress the authority to pass all laws necessary and proper to carry out the enumerated powers, leading to the establishment of certain agencies and actions as part of the implied powers of the government.

In regards to the Revolutionary Era, it is true that no state constitution at that time allowed women the right to vote. The expansion of voting rights to women came much later with the 19th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution in 1920.

The concepts and legal foundations discussed by Jefferson in the Declaration of Independence were indeed influenced by the theories of John Locke, particularly regarding natural rights and government by consent, making it true that his rationale came primarily from Locke's theories.

According to John Locke, the Glorious Revolution was a legitimate change in governance, as it reflected the consent of the governed and the protection of their natural rights, marking his approval for the event as true.

User Theodore Murdock
by
7.8k points