Final answer:
The best example of synthesizing claims and evidence is option B, which connects factual data to the claim, demonstrating how effective synthesis involves evaluating and connecting various pieces of evidence for a reasoned argument.
Step-by-step explanation:
During a group discussion, synthesizing claims and evidence is crucial for building a well-supported argument. The best example of synthesizing claims and evidence among the options given is B. Based on the data, it's evident that... This option demonstrates a clear connection between factual evidence and the claim being made. It incorporates testing and experimentation by grounding the argument in data that can be objectively analyzed and verified, drawing conclusions supported by tangible evidence. Contrast this with the other options, which rely on personal feelings, hearsay, or unsupported beliefs that do not hold as much weight in a reasoned discussion focused on factual accuracy and logical reasoning.
Effective synthesis involves combining information from various sources to support a claim or arrive at new conclusions. Such an approach does not merely summarize but evaluates and connects evidence, thus arriving at reasoned and substantiated positions. Therefore, when synthesizing research findings, it's important to look for credible inferences and verifiable facts, rather than basing arguments on personal opinions or insufficient evidence.