Final answer:
The author of the text about Martha Carrier's trial seems to suggest negative connotations towards the trial's outcome, using phrases that indicate disbelief or skepticism. Carol Gilligan's work is a separate matter, pointing out previous moral research's lack of focus on sympathetic reactions to moral situations.
Step-by-step explanation:
Based on the provided excerpts, we can infer that the author's true point of view about the trial of Martha Carrier is likely to contain negative connotations. Phrases such as "unaccountable to a great many people" suggest that the author questions the legitimacy of the jury's verdict. Additionally, the use of words like "fiendishness" when describing the crime portrays a strong negative sentiment, and the claim that the defense's view was "unaccountable" to many implies a level of disbelief or skepticism about the jury's decision.
Regarding Carol Gilligan's belief on morality research, the question references a different context, which is about the earlier oversight in moral research. Gilligan posited that previous morality studies had predominantly focused on the justice perspective and overlooked sympathetic reactions to moral situations, which she argued are more characteristic of a female approach to moral decision-making.