69.5k views
3 votes
What has a better prognosis - carcinoma in situ or metastatic osteosarcoma? Why?

User Ffmaer
by
7.2k points

1 Answer

3 votes

Final answer:

Carcinoma in situ has a better prognosis than metastatic osteosarcoma due to their different stages and behaviors.

Step-by-step explanation:

When comparing the prognosis of carcinoma in situ and metastatic osteosarcoma, it is important to understand the nature and behavior of these two conditions.

Carcinoma in situ is a stage 0 cancer, meaning it has not spread beyond the site of origin, retaining its original location. As a result, the prognosis for carcinoma in situ is generally very good, with a high likelihood of complete cure.

On the other hand, metastatic osteosarcoma is a form of bone cancer that has spread to other parts of the body, usually the lungs. This type of cancer is much more aggressive and difficult to treat. As a result, the prognosis for metastatic osteosarcoma is generally poor, with a lower chance of survival.

User Margaret
by
7.7k points