Final answer:
The implicit premise of the argument against same-sex marriage based on tradition is that anything contrary to tradition should not be allowed. This aligns with option b and underscores a traditionalist viewpoint that nuances evolving social and legal acceptance that challenges this very premise.
Step-by-step explanation:
The implicit premise of the argument is that 'Same-sex marriage is contrary to tradition. Therefore, it should never be allowed' is most closely aligned with the option (b) Whatever is contrary to tradition should not be allowed. The argument rests on the assumption that traditional standards are the determining factor in what should be permitted within society, particularly regarding the laws and acceptance of same-sex marriage.
In examining various sociological viewpoints, a functionalist may argue that widespread homosexuality could threaten societal functions such as procreation, while conflict theorists consider the social and economic struggles between differing ideological groups, such as heterosexuals and homosexuals, over the rights and resources connected to legal marriage. Moreover, public opinion about same-sex marriage has evolved significantly with increasing legal acceptance challenging traditional norms, and conflict over personal and social rights continuing to unfold in the legal and public spheres.