Final answer:
false. The claim that qualitative research conducted on social media yields limited information is false. Social media is actually a rich source for qualitative data, though it can be more challenging to organize and analyze due to its complex, subjective nature.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that the amount of information generated while conducting qualitative research in social media can be rather limited is false. In fact, social media platforms often provide a vast wealth of qualitative data. This data captures personal feelings, opinions, beliefs, and behaviors that are inherently rich in detail and complexity. Qualitative data is typically harder to organize and analyze than quantitative data because it does not lend itself to straightforward tabulation. Responses can be extensive and vary greatly from person to person, reflecting the subjective nature of qualitative research.
When researchers use questionnaires to ask open-ended questions that require essay-like responses, participants provide personal information about their religious beliefs, political views, and morals. This data is essential for understanding the complexities of human thought and behavior that cannot be captured through direct observation or simple yes/no answers.
While qualitative data from social media can be extremely valuable, researchers must exercise caution. Differentiating between fact and opinion, and recognizing fake news or unreliable sources requires a critical approach. Moreover, the process of gathering and interpreting qualitative data can be time consuming and requires a nuanced understanding of the social environment being studied.