Final answer:
The texts do not explicitly describe who gets a chariot under control after losing it, but in the context of Darius III, it was his charioteer who pulls the chariot away from battle. Other historical charioteers like Diocles achieved immense success, although the means of controlling their chariots during chaotic events aren't provided.
Step-by-step explanation:
The provided texts mention various historical figures and describe charioteering in different contexts, though none describe who specifically gets a chariot under control after losing it. However, looking specifically at the context of Darius III, it was his charioteer who took control of the chariot from the battle by using the whip on the horses, which caused them to flee. Darius III's body language, with him reaching out after throwing a spear, created a contrast to the chariot's motion, emphasizing his desperate situation. In contrast, other historical charioteers like Diocles experienced immense success, but the texts do not detail how they gained control over their chariots during challenging situations. The mention of the Roman charioteer taking a victory lap with an attendant on one of the horses suggests a well-controlled situation after a race rather than during it.
As for the excerpt regarding chariot warfare tactics from a historical perspective, the information gives general advice on using captured chariots and soldiers to strengthen one's own forces rather than detailing how individual chariots are controlled. Overall, specific strategies to gain control over a wayward chariot are not elaborated in the provided texts.