Final answer:
Procedural justice concerns decision-making fairness, while distributive justice focuses on outcome fairness. supervisors have more control over procedural justice by shaping fair evaluation processes, yet they have less influence over distributive justice like pay allocation. using procedural justice principles, such as transparency during evaluations, can mitigate perceptions of unfairness.
Step-by-step explanation:
Procedural justice and distributive justice are major aspects of organizational fairness. Procedural justice is primarily concerned with the fairness of the processes used to make decisions, such as a supervisor ensuring that employee evaluations are conducted in a consistent and unbiased manner. Conversely, distributive justice involves the fairness of the outcome itself, such as the distribution of promotions or raises. supervisors typically have considerable control over procedural justice as they can establish and enforce fair processes within their departments. However, they might have less influence over distributive justice because such decisions may be affected by organizational policies or resources that are beyond a supervisor's control. For example, a supervisor might be constrained by a limited budget when deciding pay raises.
To prevent an employee from quitting due to an unfair evaluation, a supervisor could use the principles of procedural justice by ensuring transparency, consistency, and impartiality in the evaluation process. This includes providing the employee with a comprehensive explanation of how their performance was assessed and the basis for their evaluation. By fostering a transparent process and open communication, employees are more likely to perceive the appraisal system as fair even if they disagree with specific outcomes.