Final answer:
The statement 'only items in open view may be seized' is NOT true of the open fields doctrine since the doctrine applies to the location of items in open fields, irrespective of visibility, and does not require items to be in open view for seizure.
Step-by-step explanation:
The open fields doctrine is a principle in United States law that allows for the seizure of evidence without a warrant if it is found in an open field, rather than inside a residence or its curtilage (the land immediately surrounding a residence). Among the options provided, the statement that is NOT true of the open fields doctrine is that 'only items in open view may be seized.' The open fields doctrine does not necessarily require the item to be in open view; it primarily involves the location where the item is found, not the visibility of the item. The doctrine stipulates that there are fewer expectations of privacy in open fields and thus, items there can be seized by law enforcement without the need for a warrant. It does require, however, that the seizable item not be located in a house or within the curtilage of a home since these areas have greater protections under the Fourth Amendment.