Final answer:
True, legal researchers should indeed focus on identifying authorities with fact patterns similar to their client's case while ensuring these sources are credible and relevant.
Step-by-step explanation:
True, when researching a question of fact, the researcher should focus her efforts on identifying authorities with fact patterns similar to her client's facts. In legal research, it is important to find precedents and case law that align closely with the specific circumstances of your client's situation. The researcher must also ensure the credibility of these sources by considering the background of the authors, the scope of their reporting, and the critical evaluation of the presented information.
When evaluating sources, research the author to determine if they are unbiased experts or if they might have biases that could affect the validity of their information. Utilize multiple credible sources, and remain open to modifying your thesis if the evidence does not support it. This approach helps in building a strong and truthful case. Where sources are less clear on authority or bias, use them as stepping stones to identify keywords and find more authoritative academic resources.
In summary, critical skills are essential for evaluating materials, judging credibility, and distinguishing between fact and opinion. As a researcher, asking the right questions and being diligent in seeking out the most relevant and credible information will ensure a compelling and factual argument is assembled.