Final answer:
When evaluating the sufficiency of information, it must be convincing enough for a prudent person to make the same decision. Ensuring information is well documented, based on competent references, and includes all elements of observation is essential, as is presenting facts that are reliable, statistics, and examples.
Step-by-step explanation:
A key factor in evaluating the sufficiency of information is whether the information is convincing enough for a prudent person to reach the same decision. This means the information should meet several criteria to ensure its adequacy and reliability:
- It is well documented and cross-referenced in the working papers.
- It is based on references that are considered competent.
- It bears a direct relationship to the observation and includes all the elements of an observation.
- It convinces a prudent person to reach the same conclusion, which is an embodiment of the reasonable person standard used in various professional and legal contexts.
In responding to an informational text, it is crucial to confirm that the facts presented are accurate, the inferences made are based on the facts, and that any opinions used as evidence are grounded in expertise. When conducting research and presenting information, it is important to provide reliable information such as specific facts, statistics, and examples. Keeping thorough records of ideas and information learned through the research process, including tracking and crediting sources, solidifies the trustworthiness of the information presented.
Overall, the criteria above help in determining whether the information provided is sufficient, relevant, and credible enough to support professional judgments and decisions.