53.1k views
4 votes
The issue of forgiving a criminal (for example, commuting a death sentence to life in prison) forces us to confront a contradiction between mercy (giving someone a break) and ________.

1) justice (holding someone accountable)
2) retribution (seeking revenge)
3) rehabilitation (helping someone change)
4) deterrence (preventing future crimes)

User Rivalus
by
7.9k points

1 Answer

5 votes

Final answer:

In the context of criminal justice, the contrast between extending mercy and seeking justice centers on the balance between different elements of the system, with retribution focused on punishment, while justice demands accountability. Rehabilitation looks to transform offenders, and deterrence aims to prevent future crimes.

Step-by-step explanation:

The issue of forgiving a criminal, such as commuting a death sentence to life in prison, confronts us with a contradiction between mercy, characterized as giving someone a break, and justice, which is primarily about holding someone accountable for their actions. When mercy is extended in the form of clemency, a balancing act must occur between the various facets of criminal justice, including rehabilitation, deterrence, and retribution. However, it should be noted that retribution is specifically oriented towards seeking revenge or punishment for the wrongdoing.

Justice demands accountability and ensuring the punished have consequences that align with their actions, while rehabilitation focuses on transforming offenders into positive contributors to society. Deterrence seeks to prevent future crimes by discouraging individuals through the fear of punishment. Across different jurisdictions, the extent to which these approaches are emphasized can vary significantly, reflecting different philosophies and goals of criminal justice systems.

User Jack Gore
by
9.3k points